Ruta Benjamin and her husband were sitting in their house, minding their own business, when they suddenly found themselves in violation of regulations of the Technical Standards and Safety Authority without doing anything wrong.
They live near Avenue Rd. and Highway 401, where many of the older bungalows have been torn down and replaced with what she calls "monster homes."
The bungalow next to the Benjamin home was torn down 18 months ago and replaced with a large two-storey home. The City of Toronto Committee of Adjustment had approved some minor zoning variances for the new house, and the city issued a building permit for it.
Last month, when an inspector from Enbridge Gas Distribution came to complete the final safety check of the new house, the Benjamins were served with a notice of infraction. It stated that their chimney no longer complied with the fire safety regulations of the Technical Standards & Safety Authority (TSSA) because it suddenly wasn't tall enough.
They were given a deadline to raise the chimney at their own expense or have their gas supply cut off.
The strange thing is that the new house is in full compliance with the zoning bylaws and Ontario Building Code.
The height of the chimney on the Benjamin bungalow complied with all appropriate fire and gas safety rules – until the new house was built next door. Since the top of their chimney is lower than the roofline of the new house, it suddenly becomes illegal – and the Benjamins are responsible for the cost of fixing the problem.
The result is a bizarre situation where the city issued a permit for the construction of a house but the permit created an illegal situation with the older house next door. With the city and the TSSA apparently not talking to each other, the Benjamins find that the construction of the house next door has put their own house in breach of the gas safety code.
When I looked up photos of the two houses online, I could see that the top of the Benjamin chimney is about the same height as the second floor windows in the new house, and the distance separating the two houses is fairly narrow. For fire safety reasons, chimneys must be at least two feet higher than anything within 10 feet. In this case, the Benjamin chimney is considerably lower than the roofline of the new house.
Ruta Benjamin told me she has found a contractor to raise the height of their chimney for $1,500.
Benjamin emailed me, "We happen to live in the wrong house at the wrong time, and feel that the City of Toronto should not have approved the building permit due to the impact it would have on its neighbouring property, or at the very least, (should have) required that the builder cover the cost of the upgrades to our property to ensure continued compliance."
She wrote, "We can ... see other non-compliant properties just across the street."
Benjamin was told that the city regulates the building code and the province (through the TSSA) the gas delivery code, "so essentially their hands are tied."
Frankly, I find that explanation absurd. How difficult would it be for the city to require applicants for building permits to certify that adjacent properties will not be affected by fire code requirements, or if they are, to require the applicant to pay to raise the height of the neighbouring chimney?
Bob Aaron is a sole practitioner at the law firm of Aaron & Aaron in Toronto and a board member of the Tarion Warranty Corp. Bob specializes in the areas of real estate, corporate and commercial law, estates and wills and landlord/tenant law. His Title Page column appears Saturdays in The Toronto Star and weekly on Move Smartly. E-mail bob@aaron.ca
What a totally ridiculous situation. It seems to me that the people who built the new house next door should definitely have to pay for the raising of the chimney.
I also reminds me of the situation where they are outlawing the use of chimneys completely in some places because of air pollution. In my opinion it should be handled the same way that the DMV handles emissions requirements on old cars; if the car is old enough, it is understood that the same low emissions standards cannot be placed on it like they are on newer cars. Seems only fair to me.
Posted by: housekeeping heather | January 09, 2010 at 07:16 PM