« A Milder Economic Slowdown for Canada: OECD | Main | The Limits of Title Insurance: Toronto Buyer Soaked with Vendor's Final Water Bill »

May 16, 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83420cedf53ef00e55229fc9a8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference No Crash Expected for Toronto's Condo Market: CMHC:

Comments

Popper

The Real Estate and Indebtedness Mafia willfully ignored or publically downplayed by industry participants. The mainstream media are their paid shills (grab a weekend paper and look at the percentages of advertising which is real estate or lender related!). Instead we should all worry just a little (but not too much) about...

a) the fact housing affordability is at its worst level since the last housing bubble burst [RBC. Housing Affordability. Mar-2009, p.1]

b) the fact that real housing prices have increased substantially more than during the last three housing cycles dating back 40-years (all of which ended badly) [Scotiabank. Real Estate Trends, 26-Feb-2008, p.2]

c) the fact that real housing prices in Canada have risen more from trough to peak than in the U.S., where prices and the general economy are now tanking [Scotiabank. Real Estate Trends, 26-Feb-2008, p.2]

d) the fact that Canada's housing prices-to-rent ratio is higher than in any other OECD country save Spain and 90% higher than the long-run trend [OECD Economic Outlook No. 82, December 2007. Data table can be found in the housing price ratio tab of http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/6/5/2483894.xls]

e) the fact that Canada's housing prices-to-income ratio is 32% above historic trends and substantially above ratio which prevailed when the last housing boom bubble popped in the late 80’s / early 90’s [same source as (d)]

f) the fact that the unprecedented run-up in prices have been fueled by a proliferation of risky lending practices such as (i) a decrease in the required down payment from 10% to 0%, (ii) an increase in the allowed amortization from 25-years to 40-years, (iiI) the proliferation of 7% cash back mortgages and other lending gimmicks (teaser rates, step mortgages, skip a payment, builder rate buy downs, etc.), (iv) the proliferation of home equity lines of credit, and (v) lenders not being on the hook for the vast majority of risky loans they write (CMHC guarantees low-down payment and/or extended amortizations)

g) the fact that studies show typical consumers do not fully understand the implications and risk of low down payment, long amortization and gimmicky (e.g. 7% cash back) mortgages. How many consumers do you think have run a scenario analysis which asks, “what would happen if interest rates went to 8% or 10%? What would happen if my partner or I lost our job? What would happen if real estate prices dropped by 10%, 20% or 30%? What impact will extending myself for this house have on my retirement plans?”

h) the fact that housing bubbles around the world are beginning to deflate (assuming they’re not already well underway). By way of example, the UK (admittedly a worse market then ours) mortgage lending in the first quarter is down 40% to the lowest level in 33-years and things are only beginning to get rolling there. In New Zealand housing sales are down 53% year-over-year. And we all can see what is going on in the U.S.

i) the fact that housing construction is far in excess of household formation. CMHC data shows housing starts averaging 226,000 units per year from 2003 through 2007, 33% per year above the roughly 170,000 net new households formed each year [as estimated by TD Economics and others]. Based on housing permits and starts, this trend is expected to continue well into the future.

j) the fact that Canadian MLS housing inventory is at record highs while at the same time the number of sales is dropping dramatically [Canadian Real Estate Association (CREA)]

k) the fact consumer indebtedness is at record highs relative to disposable income [Vanier Institute. The Current State of Canadian Family Finances. 11-Feb-2008. p.28]

l) the fact that savings rates are close to nil even though the baby boomers should be saving for retirement [Vanier Institute. The Current State of Canadian Family Finances. 11-Feb-2008. p.9]

m) the fact that Canadian incomes have stagnated. Statistics Canada recently “reported recently that adjusted for inflation the earned income of the ‘average’ Canadian -- the so-called median income - was the same in 2004 as in 1982”

n) the fact that the economy is bordering on a recession. The high Canadian dollar has pounded exports and the U.S. , which absorbs some 70% of our exports, is likely in a recession. And what would happen if the rose comes off the construction and commodity bloom? Heresy I know, but both of these sectors are well above trend and are the only real source of strength in the Canadian economy.
o) the fact that inflationary pressures are building, raising the prospect of higher interest costs for borrowers.

I guess it is easier to put on our rose colour glasses, look in the rearview mirror and admire how pleasant the trip has been. Never mind the cliff dead ahead.

Lie Detector

Banks/Real Estate agents are self-serving and biased and will continue to spin even as the market is sinking. Never believe them when commenting on the "market". Just look at the US. ScotiaBank's “soft landing” forcast for Canadian Real Estate sounds errily familar to the US forcasts in 2006:

Economists Predict Soft Landing For Housing

http://originatortimes.com/content/templates/standard.aspx?articleid=1828&zoneid=5

Arthur

Thanks alot John, Lie Detector and especially Popper - I think this information is really good.

For me - as a firt time buyer - even paying 150.000 could only land me a 1 bedroom condo in Scarborough - it's a joke!

I will wait for the bubble 's burst

The comments to this entry are closed.

Profile

Subscribers

Subscribe

  • Subscribe by email:

Facebook Fans

Toronto Real Estate Statistics

Realosophy

Search This Blog